Dear Editor of the Voice Newspaper ,
RACIAL AND ETHNIC
DISCLOSURE IN AFRICAN AND CARIBBEAN COUNTRIES
African and Afro Caribbean countries like Kenya,
Guiana, South Africa, Jamaica etc have 100 years plus problems of thousands of
people originally from India using British names but having arrived at the
lands in question with an Indian or Indian Chinese name. I am baffled today, as
I am reading the newspapers and what we call Kik (Indian man passing out as a
Black Caribbean man with a British name) is discussing what offends or not
African Caribbean people.
Understandably, I would not be able to speak on
behalf of African and African Caribbean people, nor would Afrikaans or Arabs
from Africa like Libyans and Moroccans so I am wondering why people
presupposing to be what they are not would state as a 'Caribbean man' that the
word monkey or ape is not offensive to black people and the war culture is at
one time low.
Now this is how the people who migrated from India
to the countries mentioned above look in the majority,
Figures: Pictures from Daily Mail on India Holy people
I am not disputing their right to say why an
African or Caribbean person shouldn't feel offended for being called Ape or
Monkey ( when this concept was what mostly convinced and legitimized Blacks
Transatlantic slave trade), I am just wondering if they have not shared nor
experienced the African History of Slavery on behalf of being deemed a monkey
or an ape, why would they -people like this ! - opinionate as to what might or
not offend Afro Caribbean people?
I would not opinionate in what would offend, or
not, a Muslim person or a Chinese person because I do not have experienced the
pride and pain , historically and culturally of being Muslim or Chinese ,so why
would I say what offends them or not or speak like one of them on behalf of
them?
For example, what do you make of this story
and it's protagonists and how hypocritical can one be in relation to the word '
monkey' , and again should we be allowed to racially and ethnically disclose
people today assuming as Afro Caribbean or African when two generations up they
were Indian with Indian names? In Africa Afrikaans, Arabs and other Africans
likewise Caribbean can well distinguish kiks because of their voices and their
caricature acting out as 'blacks' however we cannot ignore the privilege and
oppressive force kiks had in South African Army when killing Mozambicans and in
the role of South African Army fighting with rebels in the destruction of what
was once Zaire and is now DRC and Congo and prior to that of South African
troops viciously killing Angolans and Cubans which assisted Angolans during the
Colonial War against Portugal.
While White Cubans like Che Guevara were being
killed fighting for Africans freedom, Indians were being placed in South Africa
colored housing and bringing drugs from Afghanistan into South Africa. While
White Arabs like Gadhafi were working for the African Union, Indians were
exporting children from Uganda and Nigeria and putting them for sale on streets
of Italy, Portugal and Britain. My mom told me that she something that still
hunts her are the Nigerian and Ugandan girls she sees on the road every time
she must visit Cruz de Pau in Portugal.
We can't forget the violence Africans were
exposed at the hands of Indians before Idi Amin took matter in his hands and
the violence they are still exposed to by having people who never shared their
History of Slavery to talk as them on their behalf about the impact or being
likened to a monkey, an ape or a parrot.
The historical violence they were victims on
behalf of this concept is 100 times worse than an Arab person being called Ben
Laden or terrorist because that concept meant for Africans, rape, theft and
abduction from their parents and communities, forced labor, forced inter
racial rape and procreation, and centuries of exclusion and discrimination.
There is nothing less cruel, less hypocritical
than to minimize the value and meaning of being likened to little monkey, a
monkey, an ape or a parrot. Would he have likened an Arab to a terrorist or a
German to a Nazi? Would he have likened a Jewish to an Auschwitz prisoner?
Would he? Would he have likened a German to a pig?
So why can't people who are directly related to
Africa or the Caribbean like African-Arabs like Libyans, Afrikaans, Africans
and Afro Caribbean demand that families who originate from other places who
have for decades hated their hosts, personified their hosts and minimized their
history be subject to public ethnic and racial disclosure to ensure the rights
of people who are directly affected by certain words - because they were
victims of certain situations because of certain words as monkey, ape and
parrot?
I mean would this be the same as naming a Jewish
Iranian, with a Muslim name, as Jewish just because two generations up his
family migrated to Iran to escape European Nazism? In the latter case that
would be obviously anti-Semitic because of the nature of hate towards Jewish and
their need to protect themselves when societies over and over again failed to
protect them on time from Evil as Nazis, but what about these persons who other
people like me would like to say.... 'You know what, ok you look like African
Caribbean , but do you really know what it is if you don't share the History
which marked and conditioned these people from the start of the Transatlantic
slave until today'?
What's your thought on the matter?
Best wishes,
Ariane